Sue Scheff, Cyber Bully

Sue Scheff enjoys portraying herself as an expert in cyber bullying. She’s written books upon books about her status as a victim of an unfair internet harassment campaign out to get her. In recent memory there have certainly been many examples of that, from the misogynistic GamerGate to the state sponsored racist trolls that have overtaken social media. Sue Scheff, however, is not a cyber victim like in any of those examples.

On the contrary, she is a cyber victimizer. Before she decided it was fashionable to write books about cyber bullying, Sue Scheff was perfectly fine with attacking people on the basis of sexual orientation, religion, and mental health issues. But don’t take my word for it. You need only read her own words:

Sue Scheff was OK with homophobia back in 2008

The above blog was written about me back in 2008. Sue Scheff made a concerted effort to put it everywhere she could and was largely successful. In her blog, she called me a sociopath, revealed my location, my school at the time, and made fun of my sexual orientation. I’m not the only one she did this to. Joyce Harris, a former client of Sue Scheff who’s daughter was sent to Whitmore Academy, was also a victim of Sue Scheff’s cyber bullying.

Cyber stalking was fine with Sue Scheff in 2008

In her blog about Joyce Harris, she made fun of Joyce, posting a reference to her dating profile, calling her “Honker Girl” and making insinuations that Joyce was a swinger (not that it would matter if she was). But wait, there’s more. Anybody who ever criticized her got an attack blog, with the clear intent being to harass and interfere with one’s ability to make a living.

Doxing was not a concern for Sue Scheff in 2008

She made fun of victims of abusive programs, making light of where they were sent and her views of why. She had no respect for patient privacy and still doesn’t. The only reason why some of her attack blogs about others are now private is that her past attacks are no longer fashionable, especially with her current purported crusade against cyber bullying. Homophobia that once was acceptable back in 2008 hasn’t aged well. Cyber stalking hasn’t ether — or doxing — or making light of institutionalization.

Making fun of religion and mental health issues was fine with Sue Scheff in 2008

Thanks in large part to archive.org, the internet never forgets, and these sorts of cyber attacks haven’t aged well. This is what cyber bullying and harassment looks like, not efforts to expose Sue Scheff’s complicity in sending teens to abusive programs for profit. Unfortunately, as Maia Szalavitz noted on the Huffington Post, Sue Scheff has a talent for deception.

Recently, she’s even managed to fool Monica Lewinsky into writing a book forward for her. But even with all her deception, it won’t change the truth Sue Scheff is not a victim of internet bullying. She’s the architect of a successful bullying campaign, using private information, doxing, and a dodgy reputation management company to suppress criticism.

Tough Love and Free Speech

How a ‘child advocate’ gamed the media Republished From Reason Magazine with Permission of the author. Original here. Maia’s Huffington Post comment on this article here. Maia Szalavitz | August 24, 2007 Sue Scheff has some serious chutzpah. Portrayed by ABC News, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal and Forbes as a beleaguered mom running a small business to help parents find treatment for troubled teens, Scheff’s been telling reporters about a service called Reputation Defender, which she says allowed her to triumph over a bunch of rage-filled Internet cranks. Scheff says these vengeance-seeking wackos nearly destroyed her, an innocent businesswoman, with a series of libelous comments posted on online discussion boards. They had called her a “fraud” and “con artist,” she says, and claimed that she was referring teens to tough love programs that then abused them.

What none of this media coverage mentions is that a few years back, Scheff was sued for the same types of comments now directed at her—highlighting the abuses of a “tough love” rehab center (in this case, one of Scheff’s rivals). At the time, she framed the suit against her as an attempt to squelch her free speech.

Continue reading Tough Love and Free Speech

Isabelle Zehnder – Advocate or Sue’s Marketing? – Part I

Although with the recent publicity and rumors surrounding Sue Scheff have apparantly provoked Isabelle Zehnder of CAICA to distance herself, the relationship between the two in the past has been well documented, including in the words of Zehnder and Scheff themselves. Like Sue Scheff, on the surface, Isabelle Zenhder appears to be a legitimate advocate. Her website includes comprehensive information about the dangers of programs.

What most people don’t realize is most of that comprehensive information is copied verbatim from other sources without their permission. This, by itself, wouldn’t be much of a concern. What does concern many, however, is that Isabelle Zehnder refers kids to programs through Sue Scheff. Continue reading Isabelle Zehnder – Advocate or Sue’s Marketing? – Part I

Yet Another Attempt to Take Down This Site (and Fornits)

Once again, Sue Scheff has done it by complaining about fornits.com and this site. Read all about it here Note: This site may be down for a day or so while we change hosting services (again). To those who would accuse me of defamation, see the PDF attached to this post. PDF

What Sue Scheff Uses Reputation Defender to Censor

Sue Scheff often refers to herself as an “advocate”, claiming that she just wants to help children. Sue Scheff uses the slogan “parents helping parents”, publicly stating that the purpose of her organization is simply to avoid the dangers of abusive programs. Critics, however, question her commitment to the welfare of children, her honesty, and the ethics with which she conducts her business. Continue reading What Sue Scheff Uses Reputation Defender to Censor

Green vs. Focal Point Academy and Sue Scheff

Regarding Focal Point Lawsuit: Read the full complaint here. Recently, A lawsuit was filed By the Green family in Broward County Florida against both Sue Scheff and Focal Point Academy. It is alleged that Sue Scheff fradulently misrepresented her relationship with Focal Point Academy on many matters. for example:

“20. In April, 2006, Scheff also represented that she was not a licensed educational therapist, and therefore was not paid for her work, and that she was only making referrals based on the interests of the children. 2I. Scheff in no way disclosed that she was being paid for referring R.G. and others to Defendant Focal Point on a per-child basis. Contrary to Scheff’s misrepresentations, Defendant Horlacher later disclosed that Focal Point Academy pays Scheff money for each student she refers to the school.”

Continue reading Green vs. Focal Point Academy and Sue Scheff

Internet Warfare

Who is Ginger Warbis of Fornits.com? Written by: Paula Reeves www.paulareeves.com August 11, 2007 © 2007 All Rights Reserved The “Internet Wolverine” Ginger Warbis responds to threats by Sue Scheff, her company PURE (Parents Universal Resource Experts), and others in the private “teen help” business: “Hit me with your best shot, cowards! At the end of the day, I can take it. You can’t.” Continue reading Internet Warfare

Sue Scheff Threatens Fornits

Several days ago, GoDaddy recieved a theatening email sent by Sue Scheff requesting that certain content she found offensive (attached to the email) be removed from fornits.com. Whether or not the content linked to constitutes “death threats” or “internet terrorism” is largely irrelevant (judge for yourself). Nobody I have talked to sees it as such. What is relavant is the fact that she lied several times in her email to increase the percieved gravity of the alleged offenses.

Continue reading Sue Scheff Threatens Fornits